Government Issues and Politics
Insurance and Employee Benefits
Business and Economic Information
Human Resources and Safety
Education Policy and Practice
Training and Consulting Services
Human Resources and Safety
HR Issues and Laws Safety and Health Tools and Forms Comp and Benefits Publications and Posters Training and Programs

When Cupid strikes
Should you (can you) prevent workplace romances?

By Johanna Church
From the Feb. 2000 CBIA News

     Don’t look now, but Cupid is perched by the copier, waiting to strike. Love is in the air-filtration system. Who can resist getting caught up in the romance of Valentine’s Day?

     “I think you’re only asking for trouble,” says Marcia Keegan, counsel at Wiggin & Dana of Hartford. She’s talking about when love (or even just the early dances of love) strikes in the workplace.
     Office romances have long been the cause of human resource directors’ headaches. A love affair between two co-workers can cause morale issues among the other workers, opportunities for gossip among staff and, even worse, legal problems.

     But nowadays it’s tough not to be sympathetic toward employees caught up in an office romance. After all, work is often the easiest place to meet someone.

     “Where do you see people the most? It’s at work,” says Karen Ruhlemann, recruiter for J.M. Ney Co. of Bloomfield.

     “A lot of us work 10- to 12-hour days,” adds Alice DeTora, an attorney with Robinson & Cole of Hartford.

     But dealing with employees’ interoffice relationships is “a choice employers have to make,” DeTora says. “It’s a fine line between an employee’s right to free association and privacy, and an employer’s legitimate business concerns,” such as the need to prevent sexual harassment claims.

     Keegan adds, “I’ve heard employees say that they don’t feel their dating is any business of the employer. But the employee made it the employer’s business by bringing a personal issue into the workplace.”

No-dating policies vary

     DeTora says she has seen company dating policies run from one extreme to the other. Some completely ban all employees from dating in the workplace, “which doesn’t work because people do it anyway,” she says. Others simply “don’t deal with it at all.” That could open up “hidden traps,” she says.

     Most company policies generally fall somewhere around the middle, DeTora says — for example, not allowing employees who are dating or married to be in direct supervisory relationships.

     Keegan says companies should at the least have a no-dating policy for supervisors and the employees they oversee. Charges of favoritism, disruption of work, gossip and the inability to work together after the relationship goes sour are just a few of the relatively minor problems that can crop up from a supervisor/subordinate affair, she says.

     Cynthia Ambrose, human resource director for Integrated Physicians Management Services in East Hartford, says her company does not have a formal no-dating policy, but does prohibit employees from supervising their relatives, including spouses.

     “I can understand how [an office romance] could be damaging if a relationship got to a point where it was really serious,” Ambrose says. But, “I don’t want to feel like I’m running a prison.”

     An office romance can get particularly sticky if it involves someone in a human resources function. Even with its fairly liberal views on employee dating, J.M. Ney does have a policy that prohibits anyone in a human resources position from dating employees, primarily for conflict of interest reasons, says Ruhlemann.

Sexual harassment concerns

     Of course, workplace romances can stir up more serious problems, such as sexual harassment claims. “One party can claim the advances were not welcomed, or after the relationship sours one person can change their story as to whether the advances were welcomed,” says Keegan.

     She adds that the sexual harassment issue usually pertains to supervisors who have dated subordinates. When co-worker relationships dissolve, Keegan says, sexual harassment claims generally are not an issue.

     Not all companies have had bad experiences with employees’ personal relationships, however. Ruhlemann described several relationships currently going on at J.M. Ney.

     “Our facility is large enough that you can avoid the other person if you have to,” Ruhlemann says. “We’re a manufacturing facility. It’s not like in an office, where it could be difficult. Here, even if two people worked side by side and their relationship ended, the machinery is very loud. You wouldn’t even have to talk to each other.”

      When a relationship does work out and a couple ends up getting married, issues such as alleged favoritism and co-worker morale problems can still occur. For that and other reasons, many companies have a no-nepotism policy, which attorney Keegan says “is a good employee relations tool.” In these cases, one of the employees might be transferred to a different position or asked to resign.