Government Issues and Politics
Insurance and Employee Benefits
Business and Economic Info
Human Resources and Safety
Education Policy and Practice
Training and Consulting Services
Welcome to Government Issues & Politics
Legal Compliance About the Issues How to Get Involved Governor Congress Links and Resources

Fiscal Policy

 

If state revenues cannot meet the state’s expenses, those expenses have to be re-evaluated and reduced. Any tax increase would only weaken the competitiveness of Connecticut companies that are struggling to succeed in the global economy.
Encouraging greater productivity from state government is the best way to control state spending. Taxpayers expect lean, efficient and effective government services, with state government payroll and benefit costs consistent with those in the private sector.

CBIA recommends:

State Spending:

  • Adopt a new, two-year budget that is balanced without the use of tax increases that would harm the state’s economy and cost jobs.
  • Keep spending under the state’s spending cap and reject efforts to weaken the cap.
  • Bring state employees’ benefit and salary costs more in line with current practices in the private sector.
  • Adopt economic-impact statements to better determine how proposed legislation would affect Connecticut’s economy.
  • Institute a long-term plan to lower debt-service costs in the operating budget.
  • Develop uniform state contracting rules in a manner that facilitates the state’s ability to acquire goods and services efficiently and expeditiously.

Business Taxes:

  • Reject any new or increased taxes that would harm the state’s economy and cost jobs.
  • Preserve the 100%, five-year property tax exemption for new manufacturing machinery and equipment, and adopt a plan to phase out the tax entirely.
  • Reject efforts to shift more of the property tax burden onto the business community through a homestead exemption or a surcharge on commercial and industrial property.
  • Amend Connecticut’s interest add-back legislation to allow interest deductions for legitimate business purposes, as have other states in our region.
  • Provide an opt-out provision, similar to that in most other states, from new withholding rules for nonresident partners of partnerships.