Timing Issues in Employee Terminations

HR & Safety

Deciding whether an employee should be terminated is a difficult decision, involving not only whether it’s the right thing to do, but also whether it’s the right time to do it.
The appropriate personnel documentation to support a termination should be developed and shared with the employee well before the termination decision is actually made.
Effective documentation should demonstrate three key elements of fair treatment of the employee:

  • That the employee was informed of expectations for acceptable performance
  • That the employee was advised that his performance had fallen below expectations and had become unacceptable
  • That the employee was given an opportunity to correct deficiencies and advised that a failure to do so could result in employee discipline or termination

Although the employment relationship may be “at will,” lack of appropriate documentation will make the employer more vulnerable to discrimination claims.

Avoiding Retaliation Claims

Events that occur just before the termination create additional timing considerations:

Affirmative answers to these sorts of questions could support a post-termination claim of retaliation against the employee for exercising a legal right.

Implied Covenant Principle

A third issue of timing, particularly relevant at year’s end, is whether the termination is occurring shortly before the employee will become vested in a bonus plan or other benefit.

Lack of appropriate documentation will make the employer vulnerable to discrimination claims.

Connecticut courts have recognized a legal principle called the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, which prohibits an employer—even in an at-will employment relationship—from acting in bad faith to deprive an employee of a benefit that he or she had a right to receive or a reasonable expectation of receiving.
A recent decision by the Connecticut Superior Court at Stamford provides an example of a fact pattern that supported a claim of violation of the implied covenant.
The employer in the case had an incentive bonus plan that required a participant to be employed on the last day of the year in order to receive a bonus.
The plaintiff, intending to resign, gave a two-week notice as required by company policy, with a resignation date in early January in order to qualify for the year-end bonus.
However, the employer made Dec. 23 the plaintiff's last day of work and did not pay the year-end bonus.
The plaintiff sued, alleging that his last day of work was changed for the purpose of depriving him of his bonus, in violation of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
The court held that these allegations were sufficient to state a claim and denied the employer's motion to dismiss.

Create a Termination Checklist

Employers would be wise to create a termination checklist.
The checklist should be a reminder of the basics, such as return of company property, calculation of final pay, and cancellation or conversion of insurance benefits.
But the checklist should also include a review of the documentation and timing of the termination to avoid creating unnecessary issues and to be properly prepared to respond, if necessary, to post-termination litigation.

About the author: Michael LaVelle is a member of the law firm Pullman & Comley LLC in Bridgeport.
Register today for HR’s Role in Developing New Leaders, Jan. 29, 2019, from 8:30–10:30 a.m. at the CBIA Conference Center in Hartford.


1 thought on “Timing Issues in Employee Terminations”

  1. Ken Librizzi says:

    Mr. LaVelle – can you be so kind as to tell me what Conn case your article is referring to where “at-will” was “defeated” by a timing issue?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected with CBIA News Digests

The latest news and information delivered directly to your inbox.