Gov. Ned Lamont says he will now sign a bill creating a massive new paid family and medical leave mandate that applies to all Connecticut businesses.

The state House approved the bill, SB 1 on a 79-69 vote May 31, with nine Democrats joining all Republicans in voting against the measure.

House paid FMLA vote

Lamont earlier promised to veto the bill, but changed his position after reaching a compromise with legislative Democrats regarding the paid FMLA program's bureaucracy.

Those changes include reducing the size of the program's quasi-public governing board from 15 to 13 members, and letting Lamont appoint the chair.

No matter the size or makeup of the governing board, paid FMLA places a huge burden on Connecticut businesses, particularly the state's small businesses.

SB 1 creates the richest benefits of any paid family and medical leave law in the nation.

Targets Small Businesses

CBIA's Eric Gjede said one-size-fits-all mandates like paid FMLA disproportionately target small businesses, many of whom "are absolutely fearful about these measures and their cost burdens."

"The last thing we should be doing is adding to the growing cost of running a business in this state," he said.

"This bill and others this legislative session seriously erode the ability of Connecticut businesses to effectively compete, grow, and create jobs.

Small businesses are "absolutely fearful" about these measures and their cost burdens.

"It comes down to competitiveness. And this measure does not improve Connecticut's economic competitiveness."

The mandate applies to businesses with as few as one employee, allowing up to 12 weeks of paid leave for employees to care for themselves or an extended family member.

Every private sector worker in the state will be taxed 0.5% to fund the program, regardless of whether they use it or if their employer already offers leave. Most public sector workers are exempt.

Payroll Tax

Employees receive up to 95% of pay, capped at 60 times the minimum wage—$900 per week when the minimum wage reaches $15 per hour in 2023.

The state will begin collecting that tax on January 1, 2021, while the program will begin paying out benefits from January 1, 2022.

Businesses must pay nonwage benefits for employees on leave and handle all new administrative and personnel challenges.

There are also serious concerns over the program's solvency, although the bill passed in the House says benefits will be cut if program revenue does not meet demand.

"Connecticut is among the most expensive places to live, it's one of the most expensive and difficult places in the nation to run a business—stone cold facts that people who voted 'yes' blatantly ignored," said House Republican Leader Themis Klarides (R-Derby) said.

"On top of that, they forced this through on the eve of rolling out a two-year state budget that's heavy on not just middle class tax hikes, but one that also includes an insidious plan to burden the very people we need to help fire up economic recovery—small business owners."

Rep. Joe Polletta (R-Watertown) asked "if this program is so good, then why are state employees who are part of a bargaining unit exempt?"

"We're back with another bill that is bad for business," he said.

"We have heard from the business community time and time again, that they cannot make it in the state of Connecticut. These are not opinions. These are facts."

Numbers 'Don't Add Up'

Democratic state representatives Catherine Abercrombie (D-Meriden), Andre Baker, Jr. (D-Bridgeport), Jill Barry (D-Glastonbury), Pat Boyd (D-Pomfret), Daniel Fox (D-Stamford), John Hampton (D-Simsbury), Jonathan Steinberg (D-Westport), Kerry Wood (D-Rocky Hill), and Chris Ziogas (D-Bristol) voted against the bill.

Barry and Wood also voted against it when the Finance, Revenue, and Bonding Committee acted in April.

Barry said at the time that while she supports the paid FMLA concept, the bill "needed work."

"If this program is so good, why are state employees exempt?"

Rep. Joe Polletta (R-Watertown)

"I am a numbers girl and at this time the numbers aren't adding up for me," she said.

Lamont, who earlier said the program's top-heavy bureaucracy "just looks like it's not a recipe for success to me," said he will now sign the bill.

"I'm proud to soon sign my name on a piece of legislation that will help ensure this program is a national model and remains solvent for years to come," he told reporters.


For more information, contact CBIA's Eric Gjede (860.480.1784) | @egjede

Filed Under: FMLA, Labor & Employment
  • Emmanuel Goldstein

    Why are people so worried? The original program wasn’t sustainable, but now the governing board has been drastically leaned out and cut to the bone: from 15 members down to 13. That’s a 13% reduction – see, this administration IS looking at ways to cut costs. No more top-heavy bureaucracy here. Now….we just need to find people to serve on this board for two years, and then collect 6-figure pensions for the rest of their lives.